Ponderable

The deep state that would not leak it to make sure he got a fair shake? That deep state?
. . . but inadvertently spilled that laptops possibly containing e-mails that possibly could have contained classified information about Hillary's yoga schedule were going to be examined.
 
gv031519dAPR20190314084520.jpg
 
Did you read Page's testimony? How about strok?
Page says lynch lies and strok says comey lied.
Joe why do you waste you're time with these guys? You could post links all day about this to prove your point and they wont read them. Heck Andy doesn't even read the articles he post so what makes you think they will read yours? They won't because they don't want to become conflicted...
 
Post where the testimony used the word "lie" or anything similar.
The poor guy is not sharp to begin with, never even tries to come to his own conclusions about anything and his entire world view is shaped by townhall.com, breitbard.com and redstate.com. So he's full of fear and anger, which serves the rich and the Trumpies and the company that owns all of those sites (most of his websites have one mega-corporate owner).
I feel sorry for him, but on the other hand the scared, hateful and ignorant among us are the ones Trump relies on, so they need to educate themselves.
 
Post where the testimony used the word "lie" or anything similar.
REVEALED: Lisa Page Testimony Shows Obama AG Loretta Lynch Lied
Posted at 9:00 pm on March 12, 2019 by Bonchie

ap-lynch-comey-620x413.jpg


In the past few days, several transcripts of testimonies from FBI officials have been released and there’s been some very interesting revelations. One of the most eye-opening was that of Bruce Ohr, an FBI official at the center of the Steele dossier. It was shown that Ohr did in fact have extensive contacts with Steele, including the day before the FBI started investigating Trump, and that Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) lied repeatedly to cover it up.

More shoes are now dropping and the latest involves FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who testified last year in a closed door session with the House.

Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page testified last year that officials in the bureau, including then-FBI Director James Comey, discussed Espionage Act charges against Hillary Clinton, citing “gross negligence,” but the Justice Department shut them down.

That can’t be though because former Obama AG Loretta Lynch assured everyone that it was strictly the FBI’s decision on whether to prosecute Hillary or not. This was part of a weak attempt to shield herself without actually recusing from the case (i.e. she wanted to have it both ways and maintain control).

Attorney General Loretta Lynch says she will accept whatever recommendations FBI investigators and career prosecutors make about the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

“I fully expect to accept their recommendations,” Lynch said Friday during a conversation at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado.

“I will be accepting their recommendations and their plans for going forward.”

Lisa Page, via her testimony, shows that Loretta Lynch simply lied.

Page further testified the DOJ put a stop to that: “The Justice Department’s assessment was that it was both constitutionally vague, so that they did not actually feel that they could permissibly bring that charge.” The specific statute being referenced, 18 U.S. Code § 793, deals in part with “gross negligence” in the handling of national defense information, which Clinton came under scrutiny for possibly violating.

Page said Comey and the FBI spoke with DOJ about a gross negligence charge for Clinton multiple times, but that the DOJ consistently pushed back on it. “We had multiple conversations with the Justice Department about bringing a gross negligence charge. And that’s, as I said, the advice that we got from the Department was that they did not think — that it was constitutionally vague and not sustainable,” she said.

Ratcliffe asked if the decision not to charge Clinton with gross negligence was a direct order from the DOJ. “When you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: ‘You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to,’” he said.

Page responded: “That’s correct.”

This was easy to see at the time for anyone willing to look. The fact that Lynch refused to recuse was a sure fire sign that she was not actually going to give up control over the decision to prosecute. To do so would put the fate of Hillary Clinton in the hands of people who might not make the “right” decision in the Obama White House’s eyes. Instead, she went to the public and blatantly lied that she would accept whatever the FBI said. The FBI wanted to charge Hillary and tried to make the case numerous times to do so under the “gross negligence” part of the statute, according to Page. In response, the DOJ, contrary to Lynch’s framing, blew off the recommendations and simply said no.



The most likely defense you will hear from Lynch’s defenders is that once she said she’d defer, she didn’t technically tell the FBI what to do after that point. Even if that were true, publicly saying that she’d defer to the FBI, knowing she had already ordered them not to prosecute Hillary under the relevant statute, is still lying about the situation. By that point, The FBI had already been boxed in by direct orders from the DOJ, she had already met with Bill Clinton (no doubt to let him know it was over), and all the pieces to let Hillary off the hook were in place. Her attempt to throw up a last minute facade of separation does not change her coordinated dishonesty about the situation. It was a completely orchestrated cover-up from the beginning and she was pulling the strings, likely at the behest of President Obama, who never would have been left out of the loop on this.

The corruption of the Hillary Clinton email investigation is hard to understate. From allowing the destruction of evidence, to giving out immunity like candy, to deciding to let Hillary off before they even interviewed her, it’s one of the most astonishing examples of top-level government misconduct in decades. The Obama administration had their hands all over this despite their lies to the contrary. The fact that no one will likely ever be held accountable for what happened says nothing good about our government
 
REVEALED: Lisa Page Testimony Shows Obama AG Loretta Lynch Lied
Posted at 9:00 pm on March 12, 2019 by Bonchie

ap-lynch-comey-620x413.jpg


In the past few days, several transcripts of testimonies from FBI officials have been released and there’s been some very interesting revelations. One of the most eye-opening was that of Bruce Ohr, an FBI official at the center of the Steele dossier. It was shown that Ohr did in fact have extensive contacts with Steele, including the day before the FBI started investigating Trump, and that Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) lied repeatedly to cover it up.

More shoes are now dropping and the latest involves FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who testified last year in a closed door session with the House.

Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page testified last year that officials in the bureau, including then-FBI Director James Comey, discussed Espionage Act charges against Hillary Clinton, citing “gross negligence,” but the Justice Department shut them down.

That can’t be though because former Obama AG Loretta Lynch assured everyone that it was strictly the FBI’s decision on whether to prosecute Hillary or not. This was part of a weak attempt to shield herself without actually recusing from the case (i.e. she wanted to have it both ways and maintain control).

Attorney General Loretta Lynch says she will accept whatever recommendations FBI investigators and career prosecutors make about the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

“I fully expect to accept their recommendations,” Lynch said Friday during a conversation at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado.

“I will be accepting their recommendations and their plans for going forward.”

Lisa Page, via her testimony, shows that Loretta Lynch simply lied.

Page further testified the DOJ put a stop to that: “The Justice Department’s assessment was that it was both constitutionally vague, so that they did not actually feel that they could permissibly bring that charge.” The specific statute being referenced, 18 U.S. Code § 793, deals in part with “gross negligence” in the handling of national defense information, which Clinton came under scrutiny for possibly violating.

Page said Comey and the FBI spoke with DOJ about a gross negligence charge for Clinton multiple times, but that the DOJ consistently pushed back on it. “We had multiple conversations with the Justice Department about bringing a gross negligence charge. And that’s, as I said, the advice that we got from the Department was that they did not think — that it was constitutionally vague and not sustainable,” she said.

Ratcliffe asked if the decision not to charge Clinton with gross negligence was a direct order from the DOJ. “When you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: ‘You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to,’” he said.

Page responded: “That’s correct.”

This was easy to see at the time for anyone willing to look. The fact that Lynch refused to recuse was a sure fire sign that she was not actually going to give up control over the decision to prosecute. To do so would put the fate of Hillary Clinton in the hands of people who might not make the “right” decision in the Obama White House’s eyes. Instead, she went to the public and blatantly lied that she would accept whatever the FBI said. The FBI wanted to charge Hillary and tried to make the case numerous times to do so under the “gross negligence” part of the statute, according to Page. In response, the DOJ, contrary to Lynch’s framing, blew off the recommendations and simply said no.



The most likely defense you will hear from Lynch’s defenders is that once she said she’d defer, she didn’t technically tell the FBI what to do after that point. Even if that were true, publicly saying that she’d defer to the FBI, knowing she had already ordered them not to prosecute Hillary under the relevant statute, is still lying about the situation. By that point, The FBI had already been boxed in by direct orders from the DOJ, she had already met with Bill Clinton (no doubt to let him know it was over), and all the pieces to let Hillary off the hook were in place. Her attempt to throw up a last minute facade of separation does not change her coordinated dishonesty about the situation. It was a completely orchestrated cover-up from the beginning and she was pulling the strings, likely at the behest of President Obama, who never would have been left out of the loop on this.

The corruption of the Hillary Clinton email investigation is hard to understate. From allowing the destruction of evidence, to giving out immunity like candy, to deciding to let Hillary off before they even interviewed her, it’s one of the most astonishing examples of top-level government misconduct in decades. The Obama administration had their hands all over this despite their lies to the contrary. The fact that no one will likely ever be held accountable for what happened says nothing good about our government
Again, because your sources tell you to believe something doesn't make it true.
 
REVEALED: Lisa Page Testimony Shows Obama AG Loretta Lynch Lied
Posted at 9:00 pm on March 12, 2019 by Bonchiehr did in fact have extensive contacts with Steele, including the day before the FBI started investigating Trump, and that Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) lied repeatedly to cover it up.

More shoes are now dropping and the latest involves FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who testified last year in a closed door session with the House.

Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page testified last year that officials in the bureau, including then-FBI Director James Comey, discussed Espionage Act charges against Hillary Clinton, citing “gross negligence,” but the Justice Department shut them down.

That can’t be though because former Obama AG Loretta Lynch assured everyone that it was strictly the FBI’s decision on whether to prosecute Hillary or not. This was part of a weak attempt to shield herself without actually recusing from the case (i.e. she wanted to have it both ways and maintain control).

Attorney General Loretta Lynch says she will accept whatever recommendations FBI investigators and career prosecutors make about the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

“I fully expect to accept their recommendations,” Lynch said Friday during a conversation at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado.

“I will be accepting their recommendations and their plans for going forward.”

Lisa Page, via her testimony, shows that Loretta Lynch simply lied.

Page further testified the DOJ put a stop to that: “The Justice Department’s assessment was that it was both constitutionally vague, so that they did not actually feel that they could permissibly bring that charge.” The specific statute being referenced, 18 U.S. Code § 793, deals in part with “gross negligence” in the handling of national defense information, which Clinton came under scrutiny for possibly violating.

Page said Comey and the FBI spoke with DOJ about a gross negligence charge for Clinton multiple times, but that the DOJ consistently pushed back on it. “We had multiple conversations with the Justice Department about bringing a gross negligence charge. And that’s, as I said, the advice that we got from the Department was that they did not think — that it was constitutionally vague and not sustainable,” she said.

Ratcliffe asked if the decision not to charge Clinton with gross negligence was a direct order from the DOJ. “When you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: ‘You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to,’” he said.

Page responded: “That’s correct.”

This was easy to see at the time for anyone willing to look. The fact that Lynch refused to recuse was a sure fire sign that she was not actually going to give up control over the decision to prosecute. To do so would put the fate of Hillary Clinton in the hands of people who might not make the “right” decision in the Obama White House’s eyes. Instead, she went to the public and blatantly lied that she would accept whatever the FBI said. The FBI wanted to charge Hillary and tried to make the case numerous times to do so under the “gross negligence” part of the statute, according to Page. In response, the DOJ, contrary to Lynch’s framing, blew off the recommendations and simply said no.



The most likely defense you will hear from Lynch’s defenders is that once she said she’d defer, she didn’t technically tell the FBI what to do after that point. Even if that were true, publicly saying that she’d defer to the FBI, knowing she had already ordered them not to prosecute Hillary under the relevant statute, is still lying about the situation. By that point, The FBI had already been boxed in by direct orders from the DOJ, she had already met with Bill Clinton (no doubt to let him know it was over), and all the pieces to let Hillary off the hook were in place. Her attempt to throw up a last minute facade of separation does not change her coordinated dishonesty about the situation. It was a completely orchestrated cover-up from the beginning and she was pulling the strings, likely at the behest of President Obama, who never would have been left out of the loop on this.

The corruption of the Hillary Clinton email investigation is hard to understate. From allowing the destruction of evidence, to giving out immunity like candy, to deciding to let Hillary off before they even interviewed her, it’s one of the most astonishing examples of top-level government misconduct in decades. The Obama administration had their hands all over this despite their lies to the contrary. The fact that no one will likely ever be held accountable for what happened says nothing good about our government
Here is a lie from your article and it was from whomever wrote this crap not Lynch.
That can’t be though because former Obama AG Loretta Lynch assured everyone that it was strictly the FBI’s decision on whether to prosecute Hillary or not.

That is not anywhere near what Lynch said and that is actually shown inside this article. Lynch said she would leave it to the FBI and the career prosecutors. The carrier prosecutors are who shut down the possible prosecution. Which is who Lynch said was going to decide this.
 
Here is a lie from your article and it was from whomever wrote this crap not Lynch.
That can’t be though because former Obama AG Loretta Lynch assured everyone that it was strictly the FBI’s decision on whether to prosecute Hillary or not.

That is not anywhere near what Lynch said and that is actually shown inside this article. Lynch said she would leave it to the FBI and the career prosecutors. The carrier prosecutors are who shut down the possible prosecution. Which is who Lynch said was going to decide this.

The suckers just believe what they are told.
 
Here is a lie from your article and it was from whomever wrote this crap not Lynch.
That can’t be though because former Obama AG Loretta Lynch assured everyone that it was strictly the FBI’s decision on whether to prosecute Hillary or not.

That is not anywhere near what Lynch said and that is actually shown inside this article. Lynch said she would leave it to the FBI and the career prosecutors. The carrier prosecutors are who shut down the possible prosecution. Which is who Lynch said was going to decide this.

Who do the career prosecutors report to?
 
Back
Top