Ponderable

The truth hurts doesn’t it nonono. I’m here if you need a hug.

macaqueblack.jpg



Double Hug ...........
 
For two years all the left has been chanting is collusion, vote tampering, election fraud.
In the last week the left has all but dropped that claim & has swung into violations of campaign finance laws.
What will it be next week?
See John Edwards for precedent...from wikipoo.
"A federal grand jury in North Carolina indicted Edwards in 2011 on six felony charges of violating multiple federal campaign contribution laws to cover up an extramarital affair to which he admitted, following his 2008 campaign. Edwards was found not guilty on one count, and the judge declared a mistrial on the remaining five charges, as the jury was unable to come to an agreement. The Justice Department dropped the remaining charges and did not attempt to retry Edwards."
 
Last edited:
Well I never grow tired of telling you the investigation ran by REPUBLICAN Robert Mueller is not yet complete. However Rob Rosenstein the OTHER republican is overseeing the investigation. So we should know soon. Be patient.
I never get tired of you stating irrelevant facts either. What did the Russians tell us that we didn’t already know about Hilz. You people know that Comey Bot and Bernie bot did a lot of damage to the democrats as a whole.
 
I never get tired of you stating irrelevant facts either. What did the Russians tell us that we didn’t already know about Hilz. You people know that Comey Bot and Bernie bot did a lot of damage to the democrats as a whole.

Starting with what the fuck does Mueller being a Repub have to do with the time of day. What a dunce.
 
Starting with what the fuck does Mueller being a Repub have to do with the time of day. What a dunce.

You’re absolutely right. He’s obviously a credible, accomplished and unbiased individual, approved by all concerned at the time of his appointment, including the President, regardless of the fact that he’s a lifelong conservative Republican.
 
Has anyone crossed the aisle yet? Or are we all entrenched in? Half believe its all fake, and the other half think it is real. I wonder if you can bet on this fiasco?
 
For two years all the left has been chanting is collusion, vote tampering, election fraud.
In the last week the left has all but dropped that claim & has swung into violations of campaign finance laws.
What will it be next week?
See John Edwards for precedent...from wikipoo.
"A federal grand jury in North Carolina indicted Edwards in 2011 on six felony charges of violating multiple federal campaign contribution laws to cover up an extramarital affair to which he admitted, following his 2008 campaign. Edwards was found not guilty on one count, and the judge declared a mistrial on the remaining five charges, as the jury was unable to come to an agreement. The Justice Department dropped the remaining charges and did not attempt to retry Edwards."
Too funny. “The left.”
 
You’re absolutely right. He’s obviously a credible, accomplished and unbiased individual, approved by all concerned at the time of his appointment, including the President, regardless of the fact that he’s a lifelong conservative Republican.

What a rube.
 
Has anyone crossed the aisle yet? Or are we all entrenched in? Half believe its all fake, and the other half think it is real. I wonder if you can bet on this fiasco?
What is fake? There is no Special Prosecutor? He hasn’t put anybody close to Trump in jail?
Who is so oblivious as to think it’s fake?
 
You’re absolutely right. He’s obviously a credible, accomplished and unbiased individual, approved by all concerned at the time of his appointment, including the President, regardless of the fact that he’s a lifelong conservative Republican.
So is Joe Scarborough, John McCain and espola.
 
upload_2018-12-11_3-36-42.gif

OPINION
US Courts Treat Illegal Immigrants BETTER Than American Citizens
Marina Medvin | December 11, 2018




784f9c2c-11b3-4da5-8c91-f17503215a55.jpg



Immigration courts treat asylum seekers lackadaisically, incongruous to how our state and federal courts treat Americans and everyone else seeking a hearing.


In our legal system, if you don’t show up for court when you’re supposed to, a bench warrant is ordered for your arrest, be it a civil or a criminal case. If you don’t show up, you get arrested the next time that you are stopped for a speeding violation and the officer sees you have a warrant out for your arrest. But the same does not hold for “asylum” seekers. When they don’t show up for court for their mandatory hearings, nothing happens. No bench warrant, no process, nada, nothing. Oh, and before I forget to mention it, most asylum seekers - they don’t show up for their hearings. That is the dirty-little-secret that CNN likes to keep hidden in a dark corner.

“Recent data from Department of Homeland Security makes it clear – over 40,000 immigrants accused of illegal border crossings last year simply never appeared for their court proceedings,” U.S. Republican Senator Jim Inhofe wrote in a press release earlier this summer. And nothing happened to them. More strikingly, their information was never entered into police databases. They are somewhere amongst us right now. And, unlike the rest of us, who would be wanted by the police the second we miss our court dates, police will never know that these individuals failed to appear for their mandatory hearings.

 

Gender Wage Gap Is Due To Men Working Longer Hours
December 10th, 2018
GettyImages-1052808150-e1544488747177.jpg

GLASGOW, SCOTLAND - OCTOBER 23: Demonstrators hold placards as they attend a rally in George Square following a march for equal pay for Glasgow council workers on October 23, 2018 in Glasgow, Scotland. Schools and home-care services were disrupted as an estimated 8,000 workers joined a 48-hour walkout, aimed at spurring the settlement of equal-pay claims from thousands of female workers. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)


A pair of Harvard University Ph.D. candidates may have put a dagger in the mythical “gender wage gap” oft cited by politicians and pundits as an issue that can be addressed through governmental policy.

In a paper titled, “Why Do Women Earn Less Than Men?” Valentin Bolotnyy and Natalia Emanuel study the unionized environment of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA).




the MBTA as a “union shop with uniform hourly wages where men and women adhere to the same rules and receive the same benefits. Workers are promoted on the basis of seniority rather than performance, and male and female workers of the same seniority have the same choices for scheduling, routes, vacation, and overtime. There is almost no scope here for a sexist boss to favor men over women.”


GettyImages-929396162-620x413.jpg

NEW YORK, NY – MARCH 08: Dozens of women and men attend a rally and march in Washington Square Park for international Women’s Day on March 8, 2018 in New York City. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

And yet, Bolotnyy and Emanuel reported that “female workers earn $0.89 on the male-worker dollar (weekly earnings).” The Ph.D. candidates used “confidential administrative data” on the authority’s bus and train operators “to show that the weekly earnings gap can be explained by the workplace choices that women and men make.”



From the abstract:

Women value time away from work and flexibility more than men, taking more unpaid time off using the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and working fewer overtime hours than men. When overtime hours are scheduled three months in advance, men and women work a similar number of hours; but when those hours are offered at the last minute, men work nearly twice as many. When selecting work schedules, women try to avoid weekend, holiday, and split shifts more than men.

To avoid unfavorable work times, women prioritize their schedules over route safety and select routes with a higher probability of accidents. Women are less likely than men to game the scheduling system by trading off work hours at regular wages for overtime hours at premium wages.
 
Back
Top