From Russia With Love

Hüsker Dü said:
Maybe if you reference some white supremacy literature you will find the meaning.
Click to expand...

There is a sociological effect called Godwin's Law that the plumber may have been referring to, but there are also many derivative threads of meaning that have been derived from that. I'm just wondering which definition he has in mind.
 
espola said:
There is a sociological effect called Godwin's Law that the plumber may have been referring to, but there are also many derivative threads of meaning that have been derived from that. I'm just wondering which definition he has in mind.
Click to expand...
Not hard to figure out if you understand context.
Do you need me to draw a picture?
 
Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Hitler analogies)[1][2] is an Internet adage that asserts that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1";[2][3] that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Adolf Hitler or his deeds. Promulgated by the American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990,[2] Godwin's law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions.[4] It is now applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric[5][6]where reductio ad Hitlerum occurs.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Hitler analogies)[1][2] is an Internet adage that asserts that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1";[2][3] that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Adolf Hitler or his deeds. Promulgated by the American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990,[2] Godwin's law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions.[4] It is now applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric[5][6]where reductio ad Hitlerum occurs.
Click to expand...
Around here it is the starting point.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Around here it is the starting point.
Click to expand...
From both sides . . . after one of yours infers that there is nothing wrong with nazis, white supremacists or other racist hate groups and that is those that protest them that are at fault. Then of course you try the "I know you are but what am I defense" that worked so well up until 2nd grade.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
From both sides . . . after one of yours infers that there is nothing wrong with nazis, white supremacists or other racist hate groups and that is those that protest them that are at fault. Then of course you try the "I know you are but what am I defense" that worked so well up until 2nd grade.
Click to expand...
Fake News.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Kinda hurt you did I? You make it so obvious. Call it tough love, you need to learn from it and better yourself . . . I almost spit coffee just there.
Click to expand...
Kinda. It made me feel like you didnʻt pay attention to your preaching of adherence to backing up what you say. I’m over it though.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
From both sides . . . after one of yours infers that there is nothing wrong with nazis, white supremacists or other racist hate groups and that is those that protest them that are at fault. Then of course you try the "I know you are but what am I defense" that worked so well up until 2nd grade.
Click to expand...
Ohhh Nancy... please provide the post that anyone on the right here has said Nazis are good. You see, that's why you're so messed up, you buy into all the fake news even when it does not exist.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top