Girls Development Academy

For this year a club can have 12 DP's across the 01/02 and 00/99 age group or 6 DP's for the 03's. They can play up to 6 games and there is no limit to their use in any single game.
Are they altering the sub rules to more than 3 instances per game?
 
The OC Surf posting on coach assignments seems to imply that DPL will no longer be running the 03 pilot and it will be a true DA pilot. I arrive at this conclusion since they have separate coaches named for the 03 DA Pilot and the 03 DPL team. I know our team announced the DA coaches for next year and has a 02 coach/team and a 03 coach/team. They have not announced the DPL coaches yet.
 
Are they altering the sub rules to more than 3 instances per game?

I believe that is the international rule and what the DA will stick to. If FIFA changes their rules, we are set to follow. Remember top priority is to find which kids play best in the International Setting on our National team.
 
I got that info from a parent on his team. No spots guaranteed but the thought is a majority of his ‘03 ECNL team will be trying out for next years Blues ‘03 ECNL team. They are not staying with Strikers ‘03 ECNL next year. That ECNL team will be a new team, under a new coach, out of a new location, from my understanding.
Wow, that's an embarrassment of riches even for the Blues. AR's 2003 ECNL team and the Blues' 2003 DA team are both legit National Championship contenders in their respective leagues.
 
This is the 03 pilot. The new DPL. Not the backup league from last year. Southwest vs Frontier at showcases.

USA Soccer has DA pilot in other regions for GDA this year correct? It app
[
When I look at the DPL website I see a list of participating clubs now including OC Surf, Surf and Blues. Separately, I see a press release announcing the DPL 03 pilot which is dated over a week prior to the DA meeting at the Winter Showcase. It does not say that those three clubs are only doing the 03 pilot and no clubs are listed on that press release. So until we get more facts we are all guessing on how much those three clubs will be involved. We also don't know if things have changed with the DA since the DPL press release date and whether things will proceed as shown on it or if the USSDA is making the Southwest an official pilot.
Too late.... should have deleted the post then. DPL Pilot 03 follows all the DA rules including no high school.

Basically US Soccer is saying..

We know you guys are gonna go extra heavy on 02s this year and we don't want to lose all the 03s we just assimilated and tortured into the system and tell them they are pure crap to us now go away if you can't make the combo team. Please stay and be 2nd tier citizens with us instead of ECNL.

Dose of reality - this isn't really a bad idea while at the same time is a terrible idea. The 03s need their own age group again just like the 04s do. The 02s got done wrong this year and probably should have their own age group and all three should be DA. Not sure how long this should go on, but maybe for a few years until kids really come through the system at U12 and get to mature under the curriculum and regulations. It wouldn't have hurt anyone's pride to do it this way and the players who need to age up would generally do it in the clubs that allow that. This way is actually demeaning or a case of cold reality dished out on frozen plates.

Pure crap? lol....what’s wrong with you? Most DA 2001/2002 teams this year have just 2 or 3 2002s on the roster. O3 pilot DA in 2018-2019 will still be considered the A team!
 
USA Soccer has DA pilot in other regions for GDA this year correct? It app
[



Pure crap? lol....what’s wrong with you? Most DA 2001/2002 teams this year have just 2 or 3 2002s on the roster. O3 pilot DA in 2018-2019 will still be considered the A team!

Minus the their 2 or 3 best players. (I’m guessing more, from what I’m hearing) .... Maybe the 03 pilot will be more like a B+ team?:eek:
 
USA Soccer has DA pilot in other regions for GDA this year correct? It app
[



Pure crap? lol....what’s wrong with you? Most DA 2001/2002 teams this year have just 2 or 3 2002s on the roster. O3 pilot DA in 2018-2019 will still be considered the A team!


In my statement I was very clear that I'm okay with an age division split. What I'm saying is pure crap is that it isn't considered to be the normal division in DA. They don't get to go to all the showcases (no 2nd one like what they just attended in North Carolina), and will their game results be available on the US Soccer Academy website like all the other DA teams?

I have been on this forum spewing my opinion that "I love what the DA can do for the game, but DA isn't for a lot of girls" from the time we were playing vs everyone still in the Summer and we lost to a non DA/ECNL team and started getting ragged on. I stated then... DA is a whole different beast attempting to conquer goals that the high majority of teams in other leagues have no idea or concern about and certainly don't mandate. From passing out of and building from the back to how they want the ball to move up the field, etc...... Foreign concepts to most of our girls who have been the best athletes on in their teams in a WIN AT ALL COSTS environment that lacked this type of sophisticated development in most cases. This also means that the coaching needs to be at a higher level than before.

My other concern was the age grouping. I never liked it although I understood it. The sub rule didn't concern me as much if the rosters were 18 or less.

If a little ole obsessive soccer parent like me could see these issues coming in the largest, densest, most populous, most competitive part of the country called Southern California partaking in this venture , how couldn't the powers that be? Here is were the parents of olders come in and say we told you US Soccer would flub this up. Ding ding ding.

I think the DA is great and could be better if they actually took into consideration the children.... NOTICE THAT WORD - CHILDREN, they are looking to have participate in their program and recognize that it takes more than one year to break the bad habits of the lesser quality players (mentally, physically and combined) *disclaimer - lesser quality doesn't mean you suck. You suck means you suck. Lesser quality means you aren't ready for prime time in the current system and need developing and time to do so*.

You know what, may be they have and just didn't care as long as they got their 25-50 top players out of the program. Still, if your idea is to have those 25-50 top players flourish and continue to dominate on the world stage - they better be going against the most kick ass competition they can at home. That means makes the rules so the group has time to grow and adjust. Those that are ahead of the curve will be placed in advanced situations with older and better competition in the beginning anyways (see the two 03's on the Slammers 01/02 team or Solar 00/99 team). This allows for long term growth and better competition. That's how you build a system for long term growth and sustainability. Similar to how John Wooden did at UCLA, Coach K does at Duke, Pat Summit did at Tennessee and Gene A does at UConn in college basketball. The one constant is they have no more than 4 years (99% of the time) to develop these young human beings who are extremely talented and turn them into successful athletes within their particular system. All of their athletes are hand picked, same as the ones for the DA.

The difference is they rushed to put it into effect and didn't think about the product they want to produce is HUMAN BEINGS and most humans do not adjust quickly to new circumstances.

Like I've said, my kid is getting the looks, emails, invites, etc.... to universities, which is the main goal. This isn't a personal rant. My kid can play and and my kid still has a lot of dynamic growth and soccer development to come and be really good for however long she determines she wants to lace them up. I'm just watching the whole. Not just her team, but the whole and seeing kids struggle mightily and wonder how US Soccer didn't see this coming or if they simply didn't care?

Beyond that.... it's the law of the jungle buddy. Cool beans and good luck.


Also - here are the FIFA 2017/18 sub rules from their website. You can find the pdf here: http://www.fifa.com/search/?q=LAWS+OF+THE+GAME+2017-18

upload_2018-4-20_17-24-29.png
 
In my statement I was very clear that I'm okay with an age division split. What I'm saying is pure crap is that it isn't considered to be the normal division in DA. They don't get to go to all the showcases (no 2nd one like what they just attended in North Carolina), and will their game results be available on the US Soccer Academy website like all the other DA teams?

I have been on this forum spewing my opinion that "I love what the DA can do for the game, but DA isn't for a lot of girls" from the time we were playing vs everyone still in the Summer and we lost to a non DA/ECNL team and started getting ragged on. I stated then... DA is a whole different beast attempting to conquer goals that the high majority of teams in other leagues have no idea or concern about and certainly don't mandate. From passing out of and building from the back to how they want the ball to move up the field, etc...... Foreign concepts to most of our girls who have been the best athletes on in their teams in a WIN AT ALL COSTS environment that lacked this type of sophisticated development in most cases. This also means that the coaching needs to be at a higher level than before.

My other concern was the age grouping. I never liked it although I understood it. The sub rule didn't concern me as much if the rosters were 18 or less.

If a little ole obsessive soccer parent like me could see these issues coming in the largest, densest, most populous, most competitive part of the country called Southern California partaking in this venture , how couldn't the powers that be? Here is were the parents of olders come in and say we told you US Soccer would flub this up. Ding ding ding.

I think the DA is great and could be better if they actually took into consideration the children.... NOTICE THAT WORD - CHILDREN, they are looking to have participate in their program and recognize that it takes more than one year to break the bad habits of the lesser quality players (mentally, physically and combined) *disclaimer - lesser quality doesn't mean you suck. You suck means you suck. Lesser quality means you aren't ready for prime time in the current system and need developing and time to do so*.

You know what, may be they have and just didn't care as long as they got their 25-50 top players out of the program. Still, if your idea is to have those 25-50 top players flourish and continue to dominate on the world stage - they better be going against the most kick ass competition they can at home. That means makes the rules so the group has time to grow and adjust. Those that are ahead of the curve will be placed in advanced situations with older and better competition in the beginning anyways (see the two 03's on the Slammers 01/02 team or Solar 00/99 team). This allows for long term growth and better competition. That's how you build a system for long term growth and sustainability. Similar to how John Wooden did at UCLA, Coach K does at Duke, Pat Summit did at Tennessee and Gene A does at UConn in college basketball. The one constant is they have no more than 4 years (99% of the time) to develop these young human beings who are extremely talented and turn them into successful athletes within their particular system. All of their athletes are hand picked, same as the ones for the DA.

The difference is they rushed to put it into effect and didn't think about the product they want to produce is HUMAN BEINGS and most humans do not adjust quickly to new circumstances.

Like I've said, my kid is getting the looks, emails, invites, etc.... to universities, which is the main goal. This isn't a personal rant. My kid can play and and my kid still has a lot of dynamic growth and soccer development to come and be really good for however long she determines she wants to lace them up. I'm just watching the whole. Not just her team, but the whole and seeing kids struggle mightily and wonder how US Soccer didn't see this coming or if they simply didn't care?

Beyond that.... it's the law of the jungle buddy. Cool beans and good luck.


Also - here are the FIFA 2017/18 sub rules from their website. You can find the pdf here: http://www.fifa.com/search/?q=LAWS+OF+THE+GAME+2017-18

View attachment 2413

Okay, okay
 
Easy fix to all of this: US Soccer only calls players from academy teams. And watch the mad scramble. Like having a nuke. Will they use it?
 
Easy fix to all of this: US Soccer only calls players from academy teams. And watch the mad scramble. Like having a nuke. Will they use it?

In Norcal, the rumor is they already did. It will influence minimal to no movement for ECNL players to adandon their team for DA. Local US Training center invites are already biased toward DA. College is the end game and most Norcal parents aren’t that disillusioned to think their daughter is the .1%. Even parents whose daughters should actually be invited to local US trainings, maybe irritated, but not enough to abandon a coach, team, and journey they like for a pipe dream. The real showdown for who should be on the national team will be in college. Parents with ballers aren’t worried about it. Regardless of youth invites or not, those deserving will be hard to deny (i.e. Hallie Mace). Even if your end game is USNT, I doubt USSF will deny a pac-12 athletic freak and star a look because she didn’t come from a DA club.
 
I believe that is the international rule and what the DA will stick to. If FIFA changes their rules, we are set to follow. Remember top priority is to find which kids play best in the International Setting on our National team.

FIFA rules are appropriate for professional and international games (although I believe the "3" may be bypassed in some situations). Limiting subs that severely for youth developmental or showcase situations is meaningless imitation that interferes with rational coaching decisions.
 
Easy fix to all of this: US Soccer only calls players from academy teams. And watch the mad scramble. Like having a nuke. Will they use it?

That would be asinine. It's not the fault of the player about what their clubs or parents decide to do. I think we can all agree that are DDs are the ones caught in this tug of war. The only thing I see coming is the powers that be using SoCal to try to salvage GDA. Believe me when I say the only mad scramble would be from those who aren't the true unicorns. True unicorns know their value. Unicorns will be found and utilized regardless of league affiliation after all they are special.
 
In Norcal, the rumor is they already did. It will influence minimal to no movement for ECNL players to adandon their team for DA. Local US Training center invites are already biased toward DA. College is the end game and most Norcal parents aren’t that disillusioned to think their daughter is the .1%. Even parents whose daughters should actually be invited to local US trainings, maybe irritated, but not enough to abandon a coach, team, and journey they like for a pipe dream. The real showdown for who should be on the national team will be in college. Parents with ballers aren’t worried about it. Regardless of youth invites or not, those deserving will be hard to deny (i.e. Hallie Mace). Even if your end game is USNT, I doubt USSF will deny a pac-12 athletic freak and star a look because she didn’t come from a DA club.
Tell those Norcal parents not to worry about the US Training centers - big waste of time
 
That would be asinine. It's not the fault of the player about what their clubs or parents decide to do. I think we can all agree that are DDs are the ones caught in this tug of war. The only thing I see coming is the powers that be using SoCal to try to salvage GDA. Believe me when I say the only mad scramble would be from those who aren't the true unicorns. True unicorns know their value. Unicorns will be found and utilized regardless of league affiliation after all they are special.

Unfortunately the girls are caught in the fray. In Norcal, 80% of regional invites are from DA clubs - 70% from 1 DA club - despite strong ECNL league presence. No one is changing teams (that I'm aware of) because of it, but the bias is noticed. Maybe this will influence U8 parent hopefuls, but not olders. I look forward to seeing some of these girls play in D1. It'll be captain obvious by then. Our team beat the Thorns DA in a scrimmage a while back something to the order of 16-0 in the presence of a local US Soccer Scout and local college coaches. It didn't translate to regional NTC , but college coaches know where the talent is and will not be swayed by league affiliation.
 
Scrimmages do not matter. Wins and losses do not matter. Team or club standings in GDA/ECNL do not matter. Sub rules don't matter. Outside of the .001 player development does not matter. Unicorns matter. Keep drinking that koolaid.
 
Unfortunately the girls are caught in the fray. In Norcal, 80% of regional invites are from DA clubs - 70% from 1 DA club - despite strong ECNL league presence. No one is changing teams (that I'm aware of) because of it, but the bias is noticed. Maybe this will influence U8 parent hopefuls, but not olders. I look forward to seeing some of these girls play in D1. It'll be captain obvious by then. Our team beat the Thorns DA in a scrimmage a while back something to the order of 16-0 in the presence of a local US Soccer Scout and local college coaches. It didn't translate to regional NTC , but college coaches know where the talent is and will not be swayed by league affiliation.
If they are only or mainly picking girls from DA teams then they are more interested in their league vs using the best where every they come from. But as I type this I realize they are more interested in their league.
 
Unfortunately the girls are caught in the fray. In Norcal, 80% of regional invites are from DA clubs - 70% from 1 DA club - despite strong ECNL league presence. No one is changing teams (that I'm aware of) because of it, but the bias is noticed. Maybe this will influence U8 parent hopefuls, but not olders. I look forward to seeing some of these girls play in D1. It'll be captain obvious by then. Our team beat the Thorns DA in a scrimmage a while back something to the order of 16-0 in the presence of a local US Soccer Scout and local college coaches. It didn't translate to regional NTC , but college coaches know where the talent is and will not be swayed by league affiliation.
Scrimmage?? A scrimmage between an ECNL team and a DA team, is that what you are saying. Winning a game does not entitle players for national training center call ups. It is true, college coaches recruit players not teams anyway.
 
Scrimmage?? A scrimmage between an ECNL team and a DA team, is that what you are saying. Winning a game does not entitle players for national training center call ups. It is true, college coaches recruit players not teams anyway.
That DA team has the second best record in their age group in NorCal DA Their coach invited national team scouts to the game along with a couple of PAC 12 coaches. More than half their team are in the regional NTC. After that 16-0 blastibg in front all those scouts/coaches, many of us were shaking our heads about how they had so many kids invited to NTC. Something is wrong with the US soccer’s player identification process.
 
Back
Top