Ponderable

Wez said:
Bullshit, show me.
Click to expand...
He sure is pissed off about something litigated at the highest level almost thirty years ago? Rip VanWinkle syndrome? Did he just wake up or just hear about it? . . . and how mad will he be when he realizes it doesn't excuse anyone else for their behavior and after admitting to similar activity Trump was elected!
 
Lion Eyes said:
"Start a thread where you can talk all day long about your Clinton hate, that way you'll feel less inclined to constantly bring it up on every thread with every comment." wizbag
Click to expand...
You could at least once attempt to discuss current affairs? I know many of the current accusations stem from long ago, but they do involve persons in or attempting to be in the government, not long ago litigated matters on now retired politicians, like Newt.
 
Lion Eyes said:
Hillary attacked the women as liars & bimbos, she excused it all away as part of a vast right wing conspiracy...
Why wasn't he jailed is a great question, the guilty are not always convicted, (see OJ), much less charged.
Click to expand...

Are you still working on the "Impeach Hillary" project?
 
Nonononono said:
My question to you re Lerner was specific to her taking the 5th.

"Do you hold a positive or negative view of her assertion?"

Your clear and concise response was "She's a cunt. Hope that clears it up."

And it does. If you had reason to clarify a distinction you wished to draw between "cunts" in general because of their political alliances, you had that opportunity. You did not do so. The reasonable person would draw the conclusion I did, noting your position in my notes.

Then the first 5th taker from the Trump crowd is cited, to test if you would be consistent in your belief system.

You were not. And one of your sweet talking buddies chirped in his own lovely use of the English language.

Thus I expect you'll call all liberal sides 5th takers "cunts" and all Trump conspirators, abetters and obstruction of justice 5th takers as patriots.

Got it.
Click to expand...

And holding true to crazy blind obsession with being right, you jumped to your own conclusion that no one with any semblance of reason would come to. You were wrong, end of discussion... own it for once.

And for God sake, quit with the verbal vomit... JC your rants are booooorrrriiiinnnngggg son.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
You could at least once attempt to discuss current affairs? I know many of the current accusations stem from long ago, but they do involve persons in or attempting to be in the government, not long ago litigated matters on now retired politicians, like Newt.
Click to expand...

Yes its not important for past "litigated matters" to be discussed ....

Hypofuckincrite. Well done.
 
*GOBEARGO* said:
And holding true to crazy blind obsession with being right, you jumped to your own conclusion that no one with any semblance of reason would come to. You were wrong, end of discussion... own it for once.

And for God sake, quit with the verbal vomit... JC your rants are booooorrrriiiinnnngggg son.
Click to expand...
My purpose has zero to do with you. Yet you allow yourself to get all worked up over opinions you don't like reading, backed by historic facts. As opposed to fact free opinions that fit your predisposed views.

There is an ignore feature you should set to no longer be bored reading, and you can concentrate on posters who will not upset your world of fact free opinions and rants from some nutters who are actually nuts, and from at least one amongst you whose "tell" you've not observed yet. Hence your happy, smiley, thumbs up reply emojis for he who is playing you.
 
Nonononono said:
My purpose has zero to do with you. Yet you allow yourself to get all worked up over opinions you don't like reading, backed by historic facts. As opposed to fact free opinions that fit your predisposed views.

There is an ignore feature you should set to no longer be bored reading, and you can concentrate on posters who will not upset your world of fact free opinions and rants from some nutters who are actually nuts, and from at least one amongst you whose "tell" you've not observed yet. Hence your happy, smiley, thumbs up reply emojis for he who is playing you.
Click to expand...
Wow now I'm very curious
 
Nonononono said:
... you can concentrate on posters who will not upset your world of fact free opinions and rants from some nutters who are actually nuts, and from at least one amongst you whose "tell" you've not observed yet. Hence your happy, smiley, thumbs up reply emojis for he who is playing you.
Click to expand...
xav10 said:
Wow now I'm very curious
Click to expand...
Oh jeez. That was meant to be sent as a private message. Why are we only given 5 minutes to edit or delete? A fake nutter could be unmasked. And who will be at fault for THAT?
 
Hüsker Dü said:
You could at least once attempt to discuss current affairs? I know many of the current accusations stem from long ago, but they do involve persons in or attempting to be in the government, not long ago litigated matters on now retired politicians, like Newt.
Click to expand...
For me, I'm still smarting over the William Henry Harrison scandal. Refuses an overcoat at the inaugural address. Catches a flu, dies 30 days later. Ten reams of bond quality embossed letterhead ordered, paid for and delivered. $23.75. Wasted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top