Do you not have to start at the very top and change the leadership of US Soccer?I hate to see that we were eliminated. Very bothersome, especially how the game played out. Yet, can we say it was a surprise? Maybe, but possibly not. Hope this loss brings change that has been needed for sometime from the ground up and not just at the national level. As this change is needed at the core of US Soccer. I also hope if there is change it also plays a role on the women's side as well.
Yes, and a boat load of other stuff too. And, I was inferring with SG departing.Do you not have to start at the very top and change the leadership of US Soccer?
Dang, I should have just said, "Yes, please! No more SG!."Do you not have to start at the very top and change the leadership of US Soccer?
Well there product just took a major dip nationally. Maybe, bad business?US Soccer is operated for the benefit of the owners and investors of MLS.
Twellman rant speaks truths that many have argued on this forum. I liked that he questioned US Soccer. And that he brought up an example of failure that lead to a movement of change and success.
http://www.espnfc.us/world-cup-qual...26307/watch-twellman-sounds-off-after-us-exit
Kinda harsh, don't you think. If those guys can get more money and more playing time in MLS, you can't blame them for returning home.Klinsmann wanted changes. He said get over to a Europe and play because it is intense and competitive every day. So, since daddy isn't the coach, I will defy my new coach and then Bradley leaves Europe and comes to MLS, followed by Dempsey, Altidore and others. It's a soft league. Those players do not have to battle for minutes. They are starters in a crap league that will never prepare the players for international soccer.
Klinnsmann was hard on them with reality. They cried boo hoo and players quit playing. Michael Bradley was the leader in all of this mess.
Here is the good news...
https://www.socceramerica.com/publi...-bashing-overlooks-the-rise-of-a-promis.html\